Gartner Just Confirmed One of Our 2026 Predictions

Archive | Upgrade to Premium | Sponsor

Hi {{FIRST_NAME|readers}},

You’re getting this newsletter late this week…

Why?

Because Gartner released their 2026 Source-to-Pay Magic Quadrant last week…

We had a nice little piece planned on “The AI Agent Nobody Is Talking About…” Short. Simple.

But nooooooo! Gartner sent us down a rabbit hole by adding an “Intake & Orchestration-first” software vendor to its yearly ProcureTech report.

We freaked out. Our email and LinkedIn inboxes exploded.

So you know what… Yes, the newsletter is late this week…

(for the first time in a long time 🥲)

BUT you get 2 (very good, free) articles this week instead of 1:

Let’s not do this again too often…OK?

But you were worth it this week.

Onwards!

📰 In this week’s edition:

Note: Some of the content listed above is only available in the email version of this newsletter. Don’t miss out! Sign up for free to get the next edition.

Long live the “End-to-End Procurement Platform”.

Last week, Gartner quietly dropped their 2026 Magic Quadrant for Source-to-Pay (S2P) Suites. Most procurement folks skimmed it. Checked if their vendor moved up or down. Closed the tab. But buried in there was a clear signal.

For the first time, Gartner included an Intake & Orchestration provider in the S2P Magic Quadrant.

Zip made the cut.

This isn't just "another vendor added to the list." To us, this is Gartner giving the signal that I&O solutions and S2P suites are merging into the same solution category.

If you've been reading this newsletter, you know we've been banging on this drum for two years…

This is one of the strongest signals yet that the old question (“Should we buy a S2P suite OR an intake & orchestration solution?”) is obsolete.

The market has spoken. The analysts have caught up. And your procurement technology strategy? It just got a whole lot simpler. (Or more complicated, depending on how you look at it...)

Let’s get into it.

Let me show you what happened between 2024 and 2026. Because the devil is in the details… I'm a Gartner S2P Magic Quadrant scholar so you don't have to be 😅

(I first asked whether Source-to-Pay Suites were dying back in 2024. Two years later, Gartner is essentially confirming the thesis.)

2024 Magic Quadrant Definition (first S2P MQ ever published):

The "must-have capabilities" were:

And the "standard capabilities" included:

Notice what's NOT there? Intake management. It wasn't even mentioned.

2025 Magic Quadrant Definition:

Something shifted. Suddenly, "Intake management" appeared as a common feature:

"Intake management: This provides a simplified channel for end users to submit queries and requests to procurement, automatically routing them to the appropriate person or technology for tracking and processing."

Interesting. But still just a "common feature." Not mandatory.

2026 Magic Quadrant Definition:

Same language. Same positioning. But now? An “I&O-first” vendor made the cut.

What changed wasn't the definition. What changed was the interpretation.

Here’s what that looks like when mapped on a graph:

Here's where it gets practical.

That question is now officially obsolete.

You can (and should) evaluate them head-to-head in the same RFP process (if you’re going to go that route).

I ran exactly these kinds of evaluations with clients last year. Traditional S2P suites alongside I&O platforms. Same requirements. Same scoring criteria. Same demo scripts.

Guess what?

Some chose S2P Suites. Some chose I&O platforms. They were all happy with the outcome.

Because when you strip away the category labels, you're left with what actually matters: Can this platform deliver the business capabilities we need?

Here's the difference:

❌ Technology-focused requirement:
"The system must provide intake management functionality with configurable request forms and approval workflows."

✅ Capability-focused requirement:
"Business users must be able to submit any type of procurement request through a single entry point, with automated routing based on request type, spend amount, and risk level."

See the difference?

The first one is checking a box. The second one is solving a business problem.

Legacy S2P vendors will tell you they have intake management. And technically, they do (In fact, I covered how they all released their “I&O modules” in a piece a few months ago).

Read the article here:

But can S2P Suites deliver on the I&O capabilities you need for results? That's the question worth asking. Only you have the answer to that question.

If legacy S2P suites had everything procurement needed end-to-end, why did this new generation of platforms emerge?

And why do they have significant market traction?

I asked a version of this question a year ago when I wondered whether SAP Ariba was still "King of the Hill". The Gartner update is arguably the clearest market signal yet that the answer is shifting.

Here's our take:

Part of the problem is organizational. Digital literacy. Change management. Not using tech to its full potential. (Hello, that's why we run this newsletter 👋😅)

But another part? The tech itself doesn't deliver on its business case promises.

The proportion varies from org to org. But anyone who's sat through a 3-year S2P suite implementation only to see 40% adoption knows exactly what I'm talking about.

Will this new generation of “I&O-first” end-to-end platforms fill all the gaps?

Probably not.

Progress doesn't mean perfection.

Every business has different requirements because of context: industry, market, strategy, differentiation, resources, spend profile...

And change management is STILL very much necessary.

That's why there's still a massive role for "best of breed" solutions (to augment your end-to-end foundation)…

High performing procurement organizations aren't the ones with the "perfect" single platform. They're the ones who architect the right combination for their context.

We, of course, welcome this change in perspective from Gartner. We completely agree with it!

But here's our beef: the quadrant should be much more crowded.

Zip isn't the only I&O-first provider becoming an end-to-end procurement platform. There are many more out there.

In fact, we just released our Intake and Orchestration Complete Guide for 2026 to help fill this gap.

Read it here:

Just to put this evolution in context:

The end-to-end procurement platform market is expanding, not consolidating.

And the expansion is happening in one direction: toward unified, user-centric platforms that “meet employees where they work” (instead of bringing them into archaic forms and screens where procurement’s wanted them to work for years).

If you're about to start a procurement technology evaluation:

If you already have an S2P suite:

If you've been waiting for "the market to settle" before making a decision:

For years, we've been telling anyone who would listen that the line between S2P suites and I&O platforms was artificial.

Gartner just agreed.

The question was never "Which category do I need?" The question was always "What business capabilities do I need to enable?"

Now the market is finally organizing itself in a way that lets you answer that question properly.

Welcome to the era of “end-to-end procurement platforms”.

It's about time.

What's your take? Hit reply. I read every response.