"Oh ok, so all procurement platform vendors have reached parity and we can just pick the one with the best price?"

I had just walked off stage after making the case for "The Great Convergence" and that was the first question I got. Then I got it again. And again.

Three times in 20 minutes. Same question. Same misconception.

I'll get to my answer in tonight's note because it’s important (spoiler: God no)!

But FIRST, the 2026 ProcureTech Cup results you've been waiting for!

🏆 ProcureTech Solution Discovery Stream: Top 5

Twenty-four vendors. 1 week of community voting on LinkedIn.

The goal? Help you discover new ProcureTech solutions.

Here's where it landed (~1000 votes total):

  1. Kyyte — Intake & Orchestration

  2. Fairmarkit — Sourcing

  3. Sievo — Spend Analytics

  4. Vertice — E2E Procurement Platform

    1. (They’ve got an interesting webinar planned this week!)

  5. Consource — Specialized Consulting Procurement solution

My “discovery of the year”: Qolabra (SRM solution) who went all out and made a video for the event!

Full standings (all 24 vendors) in tonight's note.

🎓 ProcureTech Educator of the Year: 3-Way Tie

Conference attendees voted on the best educational vendor session after our inaugural conference last Friday. The result?

A three-way tie between:

  • SpendHQ (Making Sense of Spend Analytics solutions)

  • Fairmarkit (Making Sense of Sourcing solutions)

  • Pactum (Making Sense of Specialized procurement solutions)

👏👏👏

(I had not planned for this outcome 😅)

This prize wasn’t about having the flashiest demos… It was about highlighting the vendors that did the best job as “educators” during the conference!

🎤 Favorite Non-Vendor Session: 2-Way Tie

(I swear I didn’t plan this!! 😂 I didn’t even vote in any stream!)

  • Tom Mills (The Elevated Importance of Soft Skills in the Era of AI)

    • While you can’t see a recording of his talk unless you have a ticket, you can see Tom in action in an upcoming webinar here.

  • Brajan Gatys (Build vs. Buy Workshop — Building an AI Agent Live).

One session was deeply human. One session was deeply technical.

The fact that both won tells you everything about where this industry's head is at right now.

Congratulations to all the winners!

(And a big thank you to KonnectHouse for partnering with us on this novel event concept)

Last week was a very intense week for us at Pure Procurement. But based on the feedback received so far, it was well worth it!

Three half-days. 16 sessions. 3 keynotes. 10 vendor-led “Making sense of” sessions. 3 workshops. And a whole lot more than I can fit in this intro! 100% virtual.

We’ll definitely be back next year.

Tonight's full note has every session takeaway, the complete Discovery Stream standings, and a proper answer to the question that won’t stop ringing in my ears.

Onwards!

📰 In this week’s edition:

  • 📄 Podcast: AI-Powered Category Management (sponsored)

  • 🌙 "The Great Convergence"… and the Question I Need to Address

  • 📢 This week’s “Must Reads”

  • 📋 3 procurement jobs that caught our eye

Note: Some of the content listed above is only available in the email version of this newsletter. Don’t miss out! Sign up for free to get the next edition.

2026 ProcureTech Unpacked Conference Summary

I opened ProcureTech Unpacked with a keynote called "The Great Convergence."

The main thesis? It's no longer useful to ask whether you should buy a Source-to-Pay suite or an Intake & Orchestration platform. In the past few years, S2P suites have bolted on I&O functionality. I&O players have been filling out their offerings in an attempt to become your end-to-end procurement platform provider.

I chose those words carefully. In an attempt.

To make the case, I analyzed publicly available vendor press releases. Two slides told the whole story:

S2P Suites providers releasing I&O capabilities

Intake & Orchestration “first” providers releasing “S2P module-like” functionality.

These two slides generated more questions than the rest of the keynote combined.

The most common? "So all vendors have reached parity and we can just pick the cheapest one?"

No. Press releases are marketing documents!! Two modules can share the same name and deliver WILDLY different business outcomes.

My point was that you can now start evaluating all End-to-End Procurement Platform vendors apples-to-apples…

You can stop asking whether you need a S2P Suite OR an Intake & Orchestration solution… They now all CLAIM to do it all.

To help you see these differences for yourself, I'll be publishing two assets over the coming weeks:

  1. Procure-to-Pay (P2P) Master Requirements List

  2. Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) Master Requirements List

Why P2P and SRM?

After 15+ years implementing S2P technology, these are the two hardest functional areas to get right… And the best proof that "same name" never means "same capability."

Stay tuned.

Solution Discovery Stream Results

You voted on LinkedIn this week. Here's where it landed.

Twenty-four ProcureTech vendors participated in the Discovery Stream. Attendees voted for the solutions that impressed them most. Here are the final standings:

Rank

Company

Category

Votes

1

Intake & Orchestration

208

2

Sourcing

110

3

Spend Analytics

92

4

E2E Procurement Platform

79

5

Other — Specialized

67

6

Sourcing

64

7

E2E Procurement Platform

61

8

SRM

42

9

E2E Procurement Platform

41

10

Spend Analytics

34

11

Spend Analytics

33

12

Other — Specialized

30

13

SRM

30

14

Intake & Orchestration

27

15

E2E Procurement Platform

27

16

Other — Specialized

26

17

E2E Procurement Platform

20

18

Other — Specialized

19

19

SRM

18

20

E2E Procurement Platform

15

21

Other — Specialized

13

22

E2E Procurement Platform

6

23

E2E Procurement Platform

5

24

Other — Specialized

4

Congrats to Kyyte for the top spot! Make sure you check out vendor websites by clicking above for the vendors you don’t know!

2026 ProcureTech “Educator of the Year”

10 vendors led “Making Sense of…” session for their respective software categories.

Conference attendees voted via the end of conference survey for their “favorite educator” of the vent.

We ended up with a three-way tie!

  • SpendHQ (Making Sense of Spend Analytics)

  • Fairmarkit (Making Sense of Sourcing solutions)

  • Pactum (Making Sense of Specialized procurement solutions)

These are the 3 vendors attendees said taught them the most. Not the flashiest demos. Not the slides with the most client logos. The ones who showed up, shared real insight, and made the audience smarter.

That's the bar. And these three cleared it.

Congratulations! I hope to be able to let you hoist the ProcureTech Cup soon!!

Favorite Non-Vendor Sessions

Two-way tie based on end of conference survey votes:

  • Tom Mills (The Elevated Importance of Soft Skills in the Era of AI)

  • Brajan Gatys (Build vs. Buy Workshop — Building an AI Agent Live).

What I love about this result: the audience simultaneously craved deeply human content (how do we stay relevant and choiceful as AI takes over more tasks?) and the deeply technical content (show me how this actually gets built, live, right now).

That tension (human judgment vs. technical capability) was the undercurrent of the entire conference.

The Sharpest Moment From Every Session

Thirteen sessions. One sharp take from each. Here's what hit hardest:

SpendHQMaking Sense of Spend Analytics

Without a solid spend taxonomy, everything downstream falls apart. Don't just default to UNSPSC. A custom taxonomy is worth the effort. And don't conflate who buys something with what is bought.

FairmarkitMaking Sense of Sourcing

The future of sourcing is adaptive. You shouldn't be locked into a rigid, linear flow (RFI → RFQ → RFP → Auction). You should be able to change strategy mid-flight based on context — and your system should follow.

KeelvarMaking Sense of Sourcing

60–70% of addressable spend is never competitively sourced in most organizations. AI in sourcing is about closing that gap and increasing impact.

ConvergentISMaking Sense of End-to-End Procurement Platforms

End-to-end platform providers should be selling you outcomes, not software licenses. How they price tells you how they see themselves.

Market DojoMaking Sense of eAuctions

Don't hide behind eAuctions by limiting supplier communication. If anything, you need to be more communicative to get great results from this tool.

BeNeeringMaking Sense of Intake & Orchestration

The hard part of I&O isn't intake or orchestration. It's understanding that these tools are the piping that leads to sourcing and purchasing channels. Without robust channels on the other end, I&O alone won't deliver.

Trust Your SupplierMaking Sense of SRM

An SRM platform without proper stakeholder management and governance is just an expensive vendor database.

GraphiteMaking Sense of SRM

The organizations getting the best results from supplier management aren't faster because they work harder. They're faster because their data is better — and their processes make it better automatically over time.

PactumMaking Sense of Specialized Procurement Solutions

Specialized platforms shouldn't just provide technology. They should deliver procurement best practices adapted to your context. The goal isn't replacing human behavior… It's amplifying and scaling the best of it.

AxiomMaking Sense of Tail Spend Management

“Old guard” P2P systems and catalog management platforms were built for your top suppliers. They were never designed for the plumber, the emergency print job, or the one-off training provider. Rethinking catalog and supplier content management is how you solve the tail spend problem.

Tom MillsSoft Skills in the Era of AI

In the era of AI, procurement needs to be the conscience of our organizations. We need to be choiceful about what — and how much — we outsource to AI if we want to keep our competitive advantages.

Tanya WadeBias, Hallucinations and Liability

LLMs are trained to tell users they're absolutely right. This reinforces biases and creates real liability. "AI hygiene" isn't optional for organizations that want to stay intellectually honest.

Brajan GatysBuild vs. Buy Workshop

Building your own AI agents can be powerful, cost-effective… and dangerous. Without careful deployment and maintenance, they become the equivalent of that critical macro-ridden Excel file nobody wants to touch.

Of course, there was a lot more great content than just the above at ProcureTech Unpacked 2026. For me, the industry breakout groups were the most impactful part of the event.

Thanks again for everyone who made time to attend.

See you all next year!

P.S. If you have a ticket, you have 30 days to watch recordings and download conference assets :)

When you sell, you create a customer today. When you educate, you create a customer for life.

Unknown

2 other ways we can help this week:

  1. Why most procurement teams do not have a software problem. They have a clarity problem. In this conversation, our consulting principal breaks down why digital procurement still needs mentorship, how teams should think about the 600+ ProcureTech solutions on the market, and why the goal is not to buy more tools, but to build the right capabilities in the right order.

  2. Stop comparing apples to oranges. Most ProcureTech evaluations break down early because teams compare suites, point solutions, and hybrids as if they solve the same problem. This framework gives you a sharper way to read the market, structure your thinking, and build a technology stack around fit, integration, and business outcomes instead of vendor noise.

See you next week {{FIRST_NAME|readers}},

— The Pure Procurement Newsletter Team

P.S. Please rate today’s newsletter.
Your feedback shapes the content of this newsletter.

How did you like today's newsletter?

Login or Subscribe to participate

Discussion

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading